<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!--   ***************** DOCTYPE ***************************
Stephan Emile: May 2005
	xml2rfc reject the absolute path selected by xmlSpy. So to have Xmlspy to work, rfc2629.dtd must be be copied in the same dir as the draft to work in relative path.
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "C:\F\2005\ietf\tools\xml2rfc\xml2rfc-1.28\rfcs\bibxml\rfc2629.dtd">
-->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<!-- ***************** rfc2629.xslt  ***************************
Stephan Emile: June 2005
	XmlSpy needs an absolute path to rfc2629.xslt to display the html version in the xmlspy.Browser tab.
-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="C:\F\2005\ietf\tools\xml2rfc\xml2rfc-1.29\rfc2629.xslt"?>
<?rfc toc="yes" ?>
<?rfc tocdepth="2" ?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc iprnotified="no" ?>
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<!-- Emile Stephan FTRD: added to avoid pages with only 4 lines -->
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="yes"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-pce-tc-mib-03" ipr="full3978">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="PCE-TC-STD-MIB">Definitions of Textual Conventions for Path
    Computation Element</title>

    <author fullname="Stephan Emile" initials="E." surname="Stephan">
      <organization abbrev="France Telecom">France Telecom</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>2 avenue Pierre Marzin</street>

          <city>Lannion</city>

          <region></region>

          <code>F-22307</code>
        </postal>

        <facsimile>+33 2 96 05 18 52</facsimile>

        <email>emile.stephan@orange-ftgroup.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="1" month="July" year="2008" />

    <abstract>
      <t>This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
      for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In
      particular, it defines Textual Conventions to represent commonly used
      Path Computation Element (PCE) management information. The intent is
      that these TEXTUAL CONVENTIONS (TCs) will be imported and used in PCE
      related MIB modules to avoid duplicating conventions.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <t>This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
      for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In
      particular, it defines Textual Conventions to represent commonly used
      Path Computation Element (PCE) management information. The intent is
      that these TEXTUAL CONVENTIONS (TCs) will be imported and used in PCE
      related MIB modules to avoid duplicating conventions.</t>

      <t>For an introduction to the concepts of PCE, see <xref
      target="RFC4655"></xref>.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="The Internet-Standard Management Framework">
      <t>For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
      Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of RFC
      3410 <xref target="RFC3410"></xref>.</t>

      <t>Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
      the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
      accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects
      in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of
      Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is
      compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, RFC 2578 <xref
      target="RFC2578"></xref>, STD 58, RFC 2579 <xref
      target="RFC2579"></xref> and STD 58, RFC 2580 <xref
      target="RFC2580"></xref>.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Conventions">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL", when they appear in this document, are to be interpreted as
      described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 <xref target="RFC2119"></xref>.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Structure of the MIB Module">
      <t>This MIB module defines PCE common SMI items. It defines the nodes
      for the homing of the MIB modules and TC to be imported and used in PCE
      related MIB modules.</t>

      <t>PCE management information is arranged into 3 modules:<list
          style="symbols">
          <t>PCE-TC-STD-MIB (defined in this memo) defined the root for homing
          Standard PCE MIB modules;</t>

          <t>PCE-DISC-STD-MIB defines the management information for
          monitoring PCE entities discovery;</t>

          <t>PCE-PCEP-STD-MIB defines the information for managing PCE
          communication protocol;</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>

    <section title="PCE Textual Conventions MIB Definitions">
      <t>PCE-TC-STD-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN</t>

      <t>IMPORTS<list style="empty">
          <t>MODULE-IDENTITY,</t>

          <t>experimental FROM SNMPv2-SMI</t>

          <t>TEXTUAL-CONVENTION<list>
              <t>FROM SNMPv2-TC;</t>
            </list></t>

          <t></t>
        </list>pceTCDraftMIB MODULE-IDENTITY<list>
          <t>LAST-UPDATED "200709250000Z" -- September 25, 2007</t>

          <t>ORGANIZATION "Path Computation Element (PCE) Working Group"</t>

          <t>CONTACT-INFO "<list>
              <t>Stephan Emile</t>

              <t>France Telecom</t>
            </list>Email: emile.stephan@orange-ftgroup.com</t>

          <t></t>

          <t>Email comments directly to the PCE WG Mailing List at
          pce@ietf.org</t>

          <t>WG-URL: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pce-charter.html"</t>

          <t>DESCRIPTION<list>
              <t>"This memo defines a portion of the Management Information
              Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the
              Internet community. In particular, it defines Textual
              Conventions to represent commonly used Path Computation Element
              (PCE) management information. The intent is that these TEXTUAL
              CONVENTIONS (TCs) will be imported and used in PCE related MIB
              modules to avoid duplicating conventions."</t>
            </list>::= { pceStdMIB 1 }</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>pceStdMIB OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { experimental 9999 }</t>

      <t>-- RFC Editor: Please see the IANA Considerations Section.</t>

      <t>-- 'experimental 9999' is a temporary root for running smilint.</t>

      <t>-- 'pceStdMIB' will be homed in 'mib-2'</t>

      <t></t>

      <t></t>

      <t>-- Textual Conventions (sorted alphabetically).</t>

      <t></t>

      <t>PcePcepIdentifier ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION<list>
          <t>DISPLAY-HINT "1d.1d.1d.1d:1d:1d"</t>

          <t>STATUS current</t>

          <t>DESCRIPTION<list>
              <t>"The LDP identifier is a six octet quantity which is used to
              identify a PCE client."</t>
            </list>SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..6))</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>PceRoutingDomainID ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION<list>
          <t>STATUS current</t>

          <t>DESCRIPTION<list>
              <t>"A PCE-DOMAINS information element or a A PCE-DEST-DOMAINS
              information element carries the identifier of a routing domain
              (area, as) which type depends on both the routing protocol and
              on the version of Internet protocol in use in this routing
              domain.</t>

              <t></t>

              <t>This TC defines a common SMI type for the different kinds of
              routing domain identifiers.</t>

              <t></t>

              <t>A PceRoutingDomainID value is always interpreted within the
              context of an AddressFamilyNumbers value. Every usage of the
              PceRoutingDomainID textual convention is required to specify the
              AddressFamilyNumbers object which provides the context.</t>

              <t></t>

              <t>The value of an PceRoutingDomainID object must always be
              consistent with the value of the associated AddressFamilyNumbers
              object.</t>

              <t></t>

              <t>Following is the mapping between AddressFamilyNumbers type
              and PceRoutingDomainID size:<list>
                  <t>ipV4(1): <list>
                      <t>PceRoutingDomainID is an InetAddressIPv4
                      corresponding to the name of an OSPF area;</t>
                    </list></t>

                  <t>ipV6(2): <list>
                      <t>PceRoutingDomainID is an InetAddressIPv6
                      corresponding to the name of an OSPF area;</t>
                    </list></t>

                  <t>nsap(3):<list>
                      <t>PceRoutingDomainID type is OCTET STRING (SIZE
                      (0..20)), corresponding to the name of an ISIS area (see
                      RFC 1195);</t>
                    </list></t>

                  <t>asNumber(18)<list>
                      <t>PceRoutingDomainID type is OCTET STRING (SIZE (2))
                      corresponding to the name of an Autonomous System.</t>
                    </list></t>
                </list>"</t>
            </list>SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..20))</t>
        </list></t>

      <t></t>

      <t></t>

      <t>END</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <t>This module defines only textual conventions. As security
      considerations can only be written in MIB modules that define management
      objects this document has no impact on the security of the Internet.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>IANA is requested to make a MIB OID assignment for pceStdMIB under
      the mib-2 branch.</t>

      <t>PCE related standards track MIB modules should be homed under the
      pceStdMIB subtree. This document also requests IANA to assign {
      pceStdMIB 1 } to the PCE-TC-STD-MIB specified in this document.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml" ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2578.xml" ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2579.xml" ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2580.xml"?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <!--ee the "Guidelines for MIB Authors and Reviewers" <xref="guidelines"-->

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3410.xml" ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4655.xml" ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>